<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Escape of Sigmund Freud, By David Cohen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsfeedsblog.com/2010/01/27/the-escape-of-sigmund-freud-by-david-cohen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsfeedsblog.com/2010/01/27/the-escape-of-sigmund-freud-by-david-cohen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myron Hafetz</title>
		<link>http://www.newsfeedsblog.com/2010/01/27/the-escape-of-sigmund-freud-by-david-cohen/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Myron Hafetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsfeedsblog.com/2010/01/27/art-and-entertainment/the-escape-of-sigmund-freud-by-david-cohen/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>It would help if person who did the book review knew the major material already
 written and  then evaluated this book  for new information and
the contribution actually made. The material on Freud and Moses as
well as his Jewish identity has been present for many years in Peter
Gay&#039;s classic biography of Freud. Throw in Ernest Jones much older
and protective biography and you got very little new in this book. Using
in the Nazis as a hook for regurgitation of old hat material strikes me as
sensationalism and exploitation. Now, if the author had devoted his book
to the trials of Anton Sauerwald-then we would have something that is
needed for those that do not have the means of acquiring and translating
the trial transcripts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would help if person who did the book review knew the major material already<br />
 written and  then evaluated this book  for new information and<br />
the contribution actually made. The material on Freud and Moses as<br />
well as his Jewish identity has been present for many years in Peter<br />
Gay&#8217;s classic biography of Freud. Throw in Ernest Jones much older<br />
and protective biography and you got very little new in this book. Using<br />
in the Nazis as a hook for regurgitation of old hat material strikes me as<br />
sensationalism and exploitation. Now, if the author had devoted his book<br />
to the trials of Anton Sauerwald-then we would have something that is<br />
needed for those that do not have the means of acquiring and translating<br />
the trial transcripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

