Author: Reviewed by Julia Pascal
Sleuthing into new territories around Freud’s life, such as his mysterious Nazi ally Anton Sauerwald, Cohen also unearths Freud family secrets. He discovers the fraudsters, the suicides, the mysterious deaths, the hidden Swiss bank accounts. And, probing Freud’s own psyche, he refutes the received perception that Freud divorced himself from his Jewish heritage.
Cohen stresses the importance of Moses as a presence haunting Freud’s inner life. Freud’s most troubling work, Moses and Monotheism, posits the idea that Moses was an Egyptian who invented Judaism. He only dared publish it once he got to England.
Provocatively, Freud demoted Abraham as the father of monotheism. He believed that the creation of the Jewish God was a development of the concept of the Pharaoh Akhenaten, and that Moses transferred Egyptian belief into a new religion: Judaism. Freud’s obsession with Moses, Cohen believes, is because he saw himself as a new Moses developing a new (Jewish?) religion: psychoanalysis.
The book’s style is so engaging because Cohen shows Freud interacting with quirky individuals who leap off the page. We get Freud as seen by Hilda Doolittle, Princess Marie Bonaparte, Carl Gustav Jung and Wilhelm Reich.
The central mystery ? why Sauerwald went out of his way to help Freud ? is never resolved. Cohen realises that too many secrets are still concealed. The Library of Congress houses a huge correspondence between Freud, his patients, friends and family, as well as clinical notes. These are closed until 2020 or 2050, while eight are to be hidden “in perpetuity”. What can be so important about Freud’s life that it is denied to the public gaze?
View full article here
Related posts:



















































It would help if person who did the book review knew the major material already
written and then evaluated this book for new information and
the contribution actually made. The material on Freud and Moses as
well as his Jewish identity has been present for many years in Peter
Gay’s classic biography of Freud. Throw in Ernest Jones much older
and protective biography and you got very little new in this book. Using
in the Nazis as a hook for regurgitation of old hat material strikes me as
sensationalism and exploitation. Now, if the author had devoted his book
to the trials of Anton Sauerwald-then we would have something that is
needed for those that do not have the means of acquiring and translating
the trial transcripts.